dc.contributor.author | De Gregorio, Valentina | |
dc.contributor.author | Parola, Giulia | |
dc.contributor.author | Porrone, Arianna | |
dc.contributor.author | Poto, Margherita Paola | |
dc.contributor.author | Tsiouvalas, Apostolos | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-05T11:04:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-05T11:04:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The paper analyses the deep contributions of Indigenous knowledge on
enriching and encouraging change to laws and research and training the Western
legal systems to listen to other voices that have been silenced for centuries.<p>
<p>Methodology: The argumentation developed in the paper is based on
interdisciplinary research (intertwining social and legal reflections on the three
principles of inclusion, coexistence, and resilience) and on a novel approach to
comparative law, which includes elements of indigenous law and empirical research
(e.g. in the part of the Sea Sámi and traditional fishers), and therefore goes beyond
the desk-based comparison of Western-based state laws (e.g. in the last section).<p>
<p>Results: The paper is divided into four sections: section 1 examines the constituent
elements drawn from the training on Indigenous law and methodology: inclusion,
coexistence, and resilience. Section 2 refers to the need of inclusion and interaction
between different legal orders (state law and Indigenous and traditional peoples’ legal
orders), focusing on the case study of the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power Plant in
the Xingu Basin, Brazil. Section 3 develops the theme of coexistence analysing the
Indigenous legal traditions of the Northern Coastal peoples in the county of Troms
(Sea Sámi and traditional fishers), still kept alive and somehow co-existing with the
Norwegian system of coastal governance. Section 4 focuses on resilience with a
case study on the Arctic and the local and Indigenous peoples’ response to the
challenges posed by climate change. Finally, the concluding remarks open the floor
for a reflection on a new ontology of the relationship between humans and the natural
world.<p>
<p>Contributions: The study addresses a topic still unfamiliar to the academic world, by
adopting a novel approach to comparative law that bridges indigenous and non
indigenous views, and by proposing a new understanding of inclusion, coexistence
and resilience, that strengthens the mutual relationship between human
communities (indigenous and non.indigenous) and natural environment.The three
key lessons operate at a level of law and legal systems (Indigenous and nonindigenous), bringing out new insights in the way of approaching the law, in the
consolidation of methodologies, and research perspectives that innovatively enhance
the interactions between Indigenous and non-Indigenous views. | en_US |
dc.description | Source at <a href=http://revista.unicuritiba.edu.br/index.php/RevJur/article/view/5171>http://revista.unicuritiba.edu.br/index.php/RevJur/article/view/5171</a>. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | De Gregorio V, Parola G, Porrone A, Poto MPP, Tsiouvalas A. What can we learn from indigenous peoples law and methodology?. REVISTA JURÍDICA. 2021:289-309 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1902230 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21902/revistajur.2316-753X.v1i63.5171 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0103-3506 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2316-753X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/21737 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Unicuritiba | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | REVISTA JURÍDICA | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2021 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Social science: 200::Law: 340 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Rettsvitenskap: 340 | en_US |
dc.title | What can we learn from indigenous peoples law and methodology? | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |