dc.description.abstract | This thesis deals with resettlement and local livelihoods in Nechsar National Park, in Southern Ethiopia. It asks three main questions: Why is resettlement of the Guji out of Nechsar National Park emphasized? What are the arguments? What is the relation between the park and its natural
resources and the Guji livelihoods? What is the place and right of local communities in natural resource management in the national political context? To answer these questions, data was collected through fieldwork that involved the collection of both oral and written sources.
Qualitative analysis of the data shows that the Guji in Nechsar area are dependent on the natural
resources of the park for their livelihoods, as they get key resources like water and pasture for
their cattle from there. Despite this, park development projects in Nechsar National Park have
emphasized resettlement of the Guji out of the park. The move with which the park tried to
implement the resettlement was more coercive than participatory and consensual, despite
government decentralization policy’s recognition of the importance of local communities’
participation in natural resource management and the protection of their livelihoods, in case
environmental projects impact them. Such emphasis on the resettlement of the Guji out of the
park is embedded within conservation ideology, perception of mode of life of the Guji and local
political contexts. In view of the fact that emphasizing on the financial and environmental
aspects of protected area management to the neglect of its social dimension causes problems both
to the resource users and the wildlife, the thesis recommends the pursuance of double
sustainability, in which the protection of the environment and local livelihoods should be
emphasized simultaneously, in line with Cernea and Schmidt-Soltau (2006). | en |