dc.contributor.author | Alexeeva, Marina | |
dc.contributor.author | Moen, Marivi Nabong | |
dc.contributor.author | Xu, Xiang Ming | |
dc.contributor.author | Rasmussen, Anette | |
dc.contributor.author | Leiros, Ingar | |
dc.contributor.author | Kirpekar, Finn | |
dc.contributor.author | Klungland, Arne | |
dc.contributor.author | Alsøe, Lene | |
dc.contributor.author | Nilsen, Hilde | |
dc.contributor.author | Bjelland, Svein | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-14T13:01:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-14T13:01:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-22 | |
dc.description.abstract | Uracil arises in cellular DNA by cytosine (C) deamination and erroneous replicative
incorporation of deoxyuridine monophosphate opposite adenine. The former generates
C ! thymine transition mutations if uracil is not removed by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG)
and replaced by C by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. The primary human UDG is
hUNG. During immunoglobulin gene diversification in activated B cells, targeted cytosine
deamination by activation-induced cytidine deaminase followed by uracil excision by
hUNG is important for class switch recombination (CSR) and somatic hypermutation by
providing the substrate for DNA double-strand breaks and mutagenesis, respectively.
However, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the mechanisms leading to DNA
incision following uracil excision: based on the general BER scheme, apurinic/apyrimidinic
(AP) endonuclease (APE1 and/or APE2) is believed to generate the strand break by
incising the AP site generated by hUNG. We report here that hUNG may incise the DNA
backbone subsequent to uracil excision resulting in a 3´-a,b-unsaturated aldehyde
designated uracil-DNA incision product (UIP), and a 5´-phosphate. The formation of UIP
accords with an elimination (E2) reaction where deprotonation of C2´ occurs via the
formation of a C1´ enolate intermediate. UIP is removed from the 3´-end by hAPE1. This
shows that the first two steps in uracil BER can be performed by hUNG, which might
explain the significant residual CSR activity in cells deficient in APE1 and APE2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Alexeeva M, Moen M, Xu XM, Rasmussen A, Leiros I, Kirpekar F, Klungland A, Alsøe L, Nilsen H, Bjelland S. Intrinsic Strand-Incision Activity of Human UNG: Implications for Nick Generation in Immunoglobulin Gene Diversification. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1979463 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.762032 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-3224 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/24044 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Frontiers in Immunology | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2021 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.title | Intrinsic Strand-Incision Activity of Human UNG: Implications for Nick Generation in Immunoglobulin Gene Diversification | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |