dc.contributor.author | Rosa-Salva, Orsola | |
dc.contributor.author | Hernik, Mikołaj | |
dc.contributor.author | Fabbroni, Martina | |
dc.contributor.author | Lorenzi, Elena | |
dc.contributor.author | Vallortigara, Giorgio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-28T05:22:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-28T05:22:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-18 | |
dc.description.abstract | Domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) have been widely used as a model to study the motion cues that allow visually
naïve organisms to detect animate agents shortly after hatching/birth. Our previous work has shown that chicks prefer to
approach agents whose main body axis and motion direction are aligned (a feature typical of creatures whose motion is constrained by a bilaterally symmetric body plan). However, it has never been investigated whether chicks are also sensitive to
the fact that an agent maintains a stable front–back body orientation in motion (i.e. consistency in which end is leading and
which trailing). This is another feature typical of bilateria, which is also associated with the detection of animate agents in
humans. The aim of the present study was to fll this gap. Contrary to our initial expectations, after testing 300 chicks across
3 experimental conditions, we found a recurrent preference for the agent which did not maintain a stable front–back body
orientation. Since this preference was limited to female chicks, the results are discussed also in relation to sex diferences
in the social behaviour of this model. Overall, we show for the frst time that chicks can discriminate agents based on the
stability of their front–back orientation. The unexpected direction of the efect could refect a preference for agents’ whose
behaviour is less predictable. Chicks may prefer agents with greater behavioural variability, a trait which has been associated
with animate agents, or have a tendency to explore agents performing “odd behaviours”. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rosa-Salva, Hernik, Fabbroni, Lorenzi, Vallortigara. Naïve chicks do not prefer objects with stable body orientation, though they may prefer behavioural variability. Animal Cognition. 2023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2139645 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10071-023-01764-3 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1435-9448 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1435-9456 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30449 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Animal Cognition | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/295517/EU/Predisposed mechanisms for social orienting: A comparative neuro-cognitive approach/PREMESOR/ | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Naïve chicks do not prefer objects with stable body orientation, though they may prefer behavioural variability | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |