Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEnge, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPeelen, Frida Ostonen
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Rikke Lundsgaard
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorOlin, Ann Ödlund
dc.contributor.authorCederholm, Tommy
dc.contributor.authorBostrøm, Anne-Marie
dc.contributor.authorPaur, Ingvild
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-04T10:29:42Z
dc.date.available2024-10-04T10:29:42Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-19
dc.description.abstractPurpose In 2019, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) suggested a 2-step diagnostic format for malnutrition including screening and diagnosis. Prospective validation and feasibility studies, using the complete set of the five GLIM criteria, are needed. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of malnutrition, and investigate how the prevalence varied with mode of screening. Furthermore, we assessed the feasibility of GLIM in geriatric patients. <p><p>Methods Consecutive patients from two acute geriatric wards were included. For screening risk of malnutrition, the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) or Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) were used. In accordance with GLIM, a combination of phenotypic and etiologic criteria were required for the diagnosis of malnutrition. Feasibility was determined based on % data completeness, and above 80% completeness was considered feasible. <p>Results One hundred patients (mean age 82 years, 58% women) were included. After screening with MNA-SF malnutrition was confirmed by GLIM in 51%, as compared with 35% after screening with MST (p = 0.039). Corresponding prevalence was 58% with no prior screening. Using hand grip strength as a supportive measure for reduced muscle mass, 69% of the patients were malnourished. Feasibility varied between 70 and 100% for the different GLIM criteria, with calf circumference as a proxy for reduced muscle mass having the lowest feasibility. <p>Conclusion In acute geriatric patients, the prevalence of malnutrition according to GLIM varied depending on the screening tool used. In this setting, GLIM appears feasible, besides for the criterion of reduced muscle mass.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEnge, Peelen, Nielsen, Beck, Olin, Cederholm, Bostrøm, Paur. Malnutrition prevalence according to GLIM and its feasibility in geriatric patients: a prospective cross-sectional study. European Journal of Nutrition. 2024en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2248111
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00394-023-03323-5
dc.identifier.issn1436-6207
dc.identifier.issn1436-6215
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35052
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Nutrition
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleMalnutrition prevalence according to GLIM and its feasibility in geriatric patients: a prospective cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)