Comparison between the EKFC-equation and machine learning models to predict Glomerular Filtration Rate
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/35949Dato
2024-11-02Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Nakano, Felipe Kenji; Åkesson, Anna; de Boer, Jasper; Dedja, Klest; D’hondt, Robbe; Haredasht, Fateme Nateghi; Björk, Jonas; Courbebaisse, Marie; Couzi, Lionel; Ebert, Natalie; Eriksen, Bjørn Odvar; Dalton, R. Neil; Derain-Dubourg, Laurence; Gaillard, Francois; Garrouste, Cyril; Grubb, Anders; Jacquemont, Lola; Hansson, Magnus; Kamar, Nassim; Legendre, Christophe; Littmann, Karin; Mariat, Christophe; Melsom, Toralf; Rostaing, Lionel; Rule, Andrew D.; Schaeffner, Elke; Sundin, Per-Ola; Bökenkamp, Arend; Berg, Ulla; Åsling-Monemi, Kajsa; Selistre, Luciano; Larsson, Anders; Nyman, Ulf; Lanot, Antoine; Pottel, Hans; Delanaye, Pierre; Vens, CelineSammendrag
In clinical practice, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a measurement of kidney functioning, is normally calculated using equations, such as the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation. Despite being the most general equation, EKFC, just like previously proposed approaches, can still struggle to achieve satisfactory performance, limiting its clinical applicability. As a possible solution, recently machine learning (ML) has been investigated to improve GFR prediction, nonetheless the literature still lacks a general and multi-center study. Using a dataset with 19,629 patients from 13 cohorts, we investigate if ML can improve GFR prediction in comparison to EKFC. More specifically, we compare diverse ML methods, which were allowed to use age, sex, serum creatinine, cystatin C, height, weight and BMI as features, in internal and external cohorts against EKFC. The results show that the most performing ML method, random forest (RF), and EKFC are very competitive where RF and EKFC achieved respectively P10 and P30 values of 0.45 (95% CI 0.44;0.46) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.88;0.90), whereas EKFC yielded 0.44 (95% CI 0.43; 0.44) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.88; 0.90), considering the entire cohort. Small differences were, however, observed in patients younger than 12 years where RF slightly outperformed EKFC.
Forlag
Springer NatureSitering
Nakano, Åkesson, de Boer, Dedja, D’hondt, Haredasht, Björk, Courbebaisse, Couzi, Ebert, Eriksen, Dalton, Derain-Dubourg, Gaillard, Garrouste, Grubb, Jacquemont, Hansson, Kamar, Legendre, Littmann, Mariat, Melsom, Rostaing, Rule, Schaeffner, Sundin, Bökenkamp, Berg, Åsling-Monemi, Selistre, Larsson, Nyman, Lanot, Pottel, Delanaye, Vens. Comparison between the EKFC-equation and machine learning models to predict Glomerular Filtration Rate. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1)Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Copyright 2024 The Author(s)