Special Claims from Improvement: A Comment on Armstrong
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/23935Dato
2021-07-28Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Sammendrag
Chris Armstrong argues that attempts at justifying special claims over
natural resources generally take one of two forms: arguments from improvement
and arguments from attachment. We argue that Armstrong fails to establish that
the distinction between natural resources and improved resources has no normative
significance. He succeeds only in showing that ‘improvers’ (whoever they may be)
are not necessarily entitled to the full exchange value of the improvement. It can still
be argued that the value of natural and improved resources should be distributed
on different grounds, but that the value of improvements should be conceived
differently.
Forlag
Global Justice NetworkSitering
Heyward, Lenzi. Special Claims from Improvement: A Comment on Armstrong. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric (TPR). 2021Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Copyright 2021 The Global Justice Network