dc.contributor.author | Vears, Danya F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hallowell, Nina | |
dc.contributor.author | Bentzen, Heidi Beate | |
dc.contributor.author | Ellul, Bridget | |
dc.contributor.author | Nøst, Therese Haugdahl | |
dc.contributor.author | Kerasidou, Angeliki | |
dc.contributor.author | Kerr, Shona M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mayrhofer, Michaela Th. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mežinska, Signe | |
dc.contributor.author | Ormondroyd, Elizabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Solberg, Berge | |
dc.contributor.author | Sand, Birgitte Wirum | |
dc.contributor.author | Ljøsne, Isabelle Sylvie Budin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-12T11:29:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-12T11:29:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-22 | |
dc.description.abstract | An increasing number of European research projects return, or plan to return, individual genomic research results (IRR) to
participants. While data access is a data subject’s right under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and many legal and
ethical guidelines allow or require participants to receive personal data generated in research, the practice of returning results is not
straightforward and raises several practical and ethical issues. Existing guidelines focusing on return of IRR are mostly projectspecific, only discuss which results to return, or were developed outside Europe. To address this gap, we analysed existing
normative documents identified online using inductive content analysis. We used this analysis to develop a checklist of steps to
assist European researchers considering whether to return IRR to participants. We then sought feedback on the checklist from an
interdisciplinary panel of European experts (clinicians, clinical researchers, population-based researchers, biobank managers,
ethicists, lawyers and policy makers) to refine the checklist. The checklist outlines seven major components researchers should
consider when determining whether, and how, to return results to adult research participants: 1) Decide which results to return; 2)
Develop a plan for return of results; 3) Obtain participant informed consent; 4) Collect and analyse data; 5) Confirm results; 6)
Disclose research results; 7) Follow-up and monitor. Our checklist provides a clear outline of the steps European researchers can
follow to develop ethical and sustainable result return pathways within their own research projects. Further legal analysis is
required to ensure this checklist complies with relevant domestic laws. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Vears, Hallowell, Bentzen, Ellul, Nøst, Kerasidou, Kerr, Mayrhofer, Mežinska, Ormondroyd, Solberg, Sand, Ljøsne. A practical checklist for return of results from genomic research in the European contex. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2023:1-9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2139930 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41431-023-01328-6 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1018-4813 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1476-5438 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/28959 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | European Journal of Human Genetics | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | A practical checklist for return of results from genomic research in the European contex | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |