dc.contributor.author | Rasmussen, Ingrid Daae | |
dc.contributor.author | Mittner, Matthias Bodo | |
dc.contributor.author | Boayue, Nya Mehnwolo | |
dc.contributor.author | Csifcsák, Gábor | |
dc.contributor.author | Aslaksen, Per M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-17T06:44:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-17T06:44:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-04-26 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Several studies on patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have used transcranial direct current
stimulation (tDCS) to enhance neural excitability in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC). Interindividual differences in brain anatomy in AD patients pose a challenge to efficiently target the lDLPFC using scalpbased coordinates, calling for new and more precise tDCS protocols.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore how AD-related neuropathology affects the tDCS-induced
electric field (EF) across different DLPFC montages using computational modeling.
Method: Forty-eight realistic head models were created from structural magnetic resonance scans of AD patients
and healthy controls collected from a publicly available database. We compared the tDCS-induced EF in different
montages applied in the literature, in addition to a high definition (HD)-tDCS montage centered at electrode F3.
Results: There was an overall global reduction in EF strength in the patient group, probably due to structural
alterations that were also identified in the patient group. A widespread distribution of the EF was found across
the frontal lobe for bipolar montages, while HD-tDCS yielded more focal stimulation, mainly restricted to the
lDLPFC. Minor differences in the EF distribution were found when comparing the HD-tDCS montages.
Conclusion: Neurodegenerative alterations present in patients with AD affect the magnitude, distribution and
variability of the EF. HD-tDCS montages provide more focal stimulation of the target area, compared to bipolar
montages with to pronounced group differences between AD patients and healthy matched controls. This finding
poses substantial limitations to the comparison of cognitive effects of tDCS both between patients and controls
and within patients at different stages of disease progression. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rasmussen, Mittner, Boayue, Csifcsák, Aslaksen. Tracking the current in the Alzheimer's brain - Systematic differences between patients and healthy controls in the electric field induced by tDCS. Neuroimage: Reports. 2023;3(2):1-8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2146723 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ynirp.2023.100172 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2666-9560 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30001 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Daae Rasmussen, I. (2023). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for patients with Alzheimer’s Disease - Exploring the influence of different stimulation parameters on treatment success. (Doctoral thesis). <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/31503>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/31503</a>. | |
dc.relation.journal | Neuroimage: Reports | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Tracking the current in the Alzheimer's brain - Systematic differences between patients and healthy controls in the electric field induced by tDCS | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |