dc.contributor.author | Holm, Anne Marie Rubæk | |
dc.contributor.author | Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm | |
dc.contributor.author | Månsson, Malene | |
dc.contributor.author | Pedersen, Ditte Elmgreen | |
dc.contributor.author | Nordfoss, Pauli Holm | |
dc.contributor.author | Johansson, Daniel Klingberg | |
dc.contributor.author | Gramsbergen, Marthe | |
dc.contributor.author | Havmøller, Rasmus Worsøe | |
dc.contributor.author | Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomsen, Philip Francis | |
dc.contributor.author | Olsen, Morten Tange | |
dc.contributor.author | Møller, Peter Daniel Rask | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-23T09:28:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-23T09:28:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-10-20 | |
dc.description.abstract | The anthropogenic impact on the world's ecosystems is severe and the need for non-invasive, cost-effective tools for monitoring and understanding those impacts are therefore urgent. Here, we combine two such methods in a comprehensive multi-year study;
camera trapping (CT) and analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA), in river marginal
zones of a temperate, wetland Nature Park in Denmark. CT was performed from 2015
to 2019 for a total of 8778 camera trap days and yielded 24,376 animal observations.
The CT observations covered 87 taxa, of which 78 were identified to species level, and
73 were wild native species. For eDNA metabarcoding, a total of 114 freshwater samples were collected from eight sites in all four seasons from 2017 to 2018. The eDNA
results yielded a total detection of 80 taxa, of which 74 were identified to species level,
and 65 were wild native species. While the number of taxa detected with the two methods were comparable, the species overlap was only 20%. In combination, CT and eDNA
monitoring thus yielded a total of 115 wild species (20 fishes, 4 amphibians, one snake,
23 mammals, and 67 birds), representing half of the species found via conventional surveys over the last ca. 20 years (83% of fishes, 68% of mammals, 67% of amphibians, 41%
of birds, and 20% of reptiles). Our study demonstrates that a holistic approach combining two non-invasive methods, CT, and eDNA metabarcoding, has great potential as a
cost-effective biomonitoring tool for vertebrates. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Holm, Knudsen, Månsson, Pedersen, Nordfoss, Johansson, Gramsbergen, Havmøller, Sigsgaard, Thomsen, Olsen, Møller. Holistic monitoring of freshwater and terrestrial vertebrates by camera trapping and environmental DNA. Environmental DNA. 2023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2196305 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/edn3.481 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2637-4943 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/31857 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Environmental DNA | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Holistic monitoring of freshwater and terrestrial vertebrates by camera trapping and environmental DNA | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |