dc.contributor.author | Leinonen, Kaisa Marika | |
dc.contributor.author | Leinonen, Jukka | |
dc.contributor.author | Bolstad, Napat Limchaichana | |
dc.contributor.author | Tanner, Tarja | |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Haroni, Mohammed Hasan Hussein | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnsen, Jan Are Kolset | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-19T08:11:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-19T08:11:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The aims of this randomised controlled laboratory trial were to determine the procedure time and
immediate quality (surface porosity and marginal gaps) of fillings placed using the bulk-fill base technique and
the conventional incremental technique in simulated clinical settings.<p>
<p>Methods: Forty-two dentists and dental students were randomly allocated to use either the bulk-fill base technique or the conventional incremental technique to fill an identical class II disto-occlusal cavity in a maxillary
left first molar typodont tooth. We recorded the time the participants used to fill the cavity and evaluated the
surface porosity and marginal gaps on the approximal surfaces of the fillings using a stereomicroscope and
specific probes according to the FDI criteria for restoration evaluation. Data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, and chi-square tests.
<p>Results: The median time ± interquartile range was 186 ± 80 s for the bulk-fill base technique and 463 ± 156 s
for the conventional incremental technique (p < 0.001). The quality of the fillings was better for the bulk-fill base
technique than for the conventional incremental technique (X<sup>2</sup> = 9.5, p = 0.002). Neither operator experience
nor the usual technique of choice were associated with the procedure time or the quality of the fillings.
<p>Conclusions: Compared to the conventional incremental technique, the use of the bulk-fill base technique
shortened the time to fill a cavity by 59.8 % or 4 min and 36 s, and it improved the immediate surface and
marginal quality of the fillings, regardless of the operator’s experience or technique preference.
<p>Clinical significance: The use of the bulk-fill base technique instead of the conventional incremental technique
leads to significant time-savings when placing large class II composite fillings. Additionally, the use of the bulkfill base technique instead of the conventional incremental technique improves the immediate quality of large
class II composite fillings. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Leinonen, Leinonen, Bolstad, Tanner, Al-Haroni, Johnsen. Procedure time and filling quality for bulk-fill base and conventional incremental composite techniques—A randomised controlled in vitro trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2023;138 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2181362 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104725 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0300-5712 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-176X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/32153 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Dentistry | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Procedure time and filling quality for bulk-fill base and conventional incremental composite techniques—A randomised controlled in vitro trial | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |