Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMantzourani, E.
dc.contributor.authorJames, D.H.
dc.contributor.authorAkthar, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, S.L.
dc.contributor.authorYemm, R.
dc.contributor.authorLehnbom, Elin Christina
dc.contributor.authorHanrahan, J.R.
dc.contributor.authorSeage, C.H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-06T11:41:35Z
dc.date.available2024-09-06T11:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-08
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pharmacy professionals are well-placed to provide medication adherence support to patients. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM–B) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) are two complementary models previously applied to medication-taking behaviour. Understanding the patient-specific barriers and facilitators to adherence using psychological frameworks from the early stages of pharmacy education enables the design and delivery of effective interventions. Objectives: To examine whether a novel ‘mock medicine’ learning activity enabled students to experience the range of barriers and facilitators to medication adherence using the COM-B and TDF. Methods: A mock medicine activity was conducted with students at pharmacy schools in three universities in the UK, Norway, and Australia over one week. Percentage adherence was calculated for five dosing regimens; theoretical framework analysis was applied to map reflective statements from student logs to COM-B and TDF. Results: A total of 349 students (52.6%) returned completed logs, with high overall mean adherence (83.5%, range 0–100%). Analysis of the 277 (79.4%) students who provided reflective statements included barriers and facilitators that mapped onto one (9%), two (29%) or all three (62%) of the COM-B components and all fourteen TDF domains (overall mean = 4.04; Uni 1 = 3.72; Uni 2 = 4.50; Uni 3 = 4.38; range 1–8). Most frequently mapped domains were ‘Environmental context and resources’ (n = 199; 72%), ‘Skills’ (n = 186; 67%), ‘Memory, attention and decision-making’ (184; 66%) and ‘Beliefs about capabilities’ (n = 175; 63%). Conclusions: This is the first study to utilise both COM-B and TDF to analyse a proxy measure of medication adherence in pharmacy education. Data mapping demonstrated that students experienced similar issues to patients when prescribed a short course of medication. Importantly, all the factors influencing medication-taking reported by students were captured by these two psychological frameworks. Future educational strategies will involve students in the mapping exercise to gain hands-on experience of using these psychological constructs in practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMantzourani, James, Akthar, Brown, Yemm, Lehnbom, Hanrahan, Seage. Can a mock medication-taking learning activity enable pharmacy students to experience the range of barriers and facilitators to medication adherence? An analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy (ERCSP). 2024;13en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2240381
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100393
dc.identifier.issn2667-2766
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/34545
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalExploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy (ERCSP)
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en_US
dc.titleCan a mock medication-taking learning activity enable pharmacy students to experience the range of barriers and facilitators to medication adherence? An analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B modelen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)