dc.contributor.author | Jong, Miek | |
dc.contributor.author | Mulder, Eric | |
dc.contributor.author | Kristoffersen, Agnete Egilsdatter | |
dc.contributor.author | Stub, Trine | |
dc.contributor.author | Dahlqvist, Heléne | |
dc.contributor.author | Viitasara, Eija | |
dc.contributor.author | Lown E., Anne | |
dc.contributor.author | Schats, Winnie | |
dc.contributor.author | Jong, Mats | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-15T09:55:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-15T09:55:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | <p><b>
Introduction </b>
The majority of childhood, adolescent and
young adult (AYA) cancer survivors suffer from long-term
and late effects such as fatigue, psychological distress or
comorbid diseases. Effective health promotion strategies
are needed to support the health of this vulnerable group.
This protocol provides a methodological description of
a study that aims to examine the feasibility and safety
of performing a randomised clinical trial (RCT) on a
wilderness programme that is developed to support the
health of AYA cancer survivors.
<p><b>
Methods and analysis </b>
The pilot RCT study has a mixedmethod design, including quantitative and qualitative
evaluations. Participants are AYAs, aged 16–39 years,
that have been diagnosed with cancer during childhood,
adolescence or young adulthood. A total of 40 participants
will be randomly assigned to a wilderness programme
(n=20) or a holiday programme (n=20). Both arms include
participation in an 8-day summer programme, followed
by a 4-day programme 3 months later. Primary outcomes
are feasibility and safety parameters such as time to
recruitment, willingness to be randomised, programme
adherence and adverse effects. Secondary outcomes
include self-reported health such as self-esteem, quality
of life, self-efficacy and lived experiences. Descriptive
statistics will be used to analyse outcomes and explore
indications of differences between the programmes.
Interviews are analysed by directed content analysis
and hermeneutic phenomenology. A convergent parallel
mixed-method analysis design will be applied to integrate
quantitative and qualitative data. Results of this feasibility
study will inform the preparation for a larger RCT with AYA
cancer survivors.
<p><b>
Ethics and dissemination</b>
The study protocol is
approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority
(reference: 2020-00239). This study will be performed
between January 2021 and December 2023. Results
will be published in international peer-reviewed
journals, presented at conferences and disseminated to
participants, cancer societies, healthcare professionals
and outdoor instructors. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Jong M, Mulder E, Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Dahlqvist, Viitasara, Lown E., Schats W, Jong M. Protocol of a mixed method randomized controlled pilot study evaluating a wilderness program for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the WAYA study. BMJ Open. 2022;12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2055743 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/ bmjopen-2022-061502 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27834 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | BMJ Open | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Protocol of a mixed method randomized controlled pilot study evaluating a wilderness program for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the WAYA study | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |