Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHorn, Cathrine
dc.contributor.authorGjerde, Eirin Semb
dc.contributor.authorLaupsa-Borge, Johnny
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Amanda Iselin Olesen
dc.contributor.authorLawrence-Archer, Laurence
dc.contributor.authorMcCann, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorHansson, Patrik
dc.contributor.authorRaza, Ghulam S.
dc.contributor.authorHerzig, Karl Heinz
dc.contributor.authorLied, Gülen Arslan
dc.contributor.authorAlho Letra Martins, Catia Patricia
dc.contributor.authorMellgren, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorDierkes, Jutta
dc.contributor.authorDankel, Simon N
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T12:25:31Z
dc.date.available2023-07-11T12:25:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-29
dc.description.abstractBackground - Low-carbohydrate high-fat (LCHF) diets may suppress the increase in appetite otherwise seen after diet-induced fat loss. However, studies of diets without severe energy restriction are lacking, and the effects of carbohydrate quality relative to quantity have not been directly compared.<p> <p>Objectives - To evaluated short- (3 mo) and long-term (12 mo) changes in fasting plasma concentrations of total ghrelin, β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB), and subjective feelings of appetite on 3 isocaloric eating patterns within a moderate caloric range (2000–2500 kcal/d) and with varying carbohydrate quality or quantity.<p> <p>Methods - We performed a randomized controlled trial of 193 adults with obesity, comparing eating patterns based on “acellular” carbohydrate sources (e.g., flour-based whole-grain products; comparator arm), “cellular” carbohydrate sources (minimally processed foods with intact cellular structures), or LCHF principles. Outcomes were compared by an intention-to-treat analysis using constrained linear mixed modeling. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03401970.<p> <p>Results - Of the 193 adults, 118 (61%) and 57 (30%) completed 3 and 12 mo of follow-up. Throughout the intervention, intakes of protein and energy were similar with all 3 eating patterns, with comparable reductions in body weight (5%−7%) and visceral fat volume (12%−17%) after 12 mo. After 3 mo, ghrelin increased significantly with the acellular (mean: 46 pg/mL; 95% CI: 11, 81) and cellular (mean: 54 pg/mL; 95% CI: 21, 88) diets but not with the LCHF diet (mean: 11 pg/mL; 95% CI: −16, 38). Although βHB increased significantly more with the LCHF diet than with the acellular diet after 3 m (mean: 0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.24), this did not correspond to a significant group difference in ghrelin (unless the 2 high-carbohydrate groups were combined [mean: −39.6 pg/mL; 95% CI: −76, −3.3]). No significant between-group differences were seen in feelings of hunger.<p> <p>Conclusions - Modestly energy-restricted isocaloric diets differing in carbohydrate cellularity and amount showed no significant differences in fasting total ghrelin or subjective hunger feelings. An increase in ketones with the LCHF diet to 0.3–0.4 mmol/L was insufficient to substantially curb increases in fasting ghrelin during fat loss.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHorn, Gjerde, Laupsa-Borge, Andersen, Lawrence-Archer L, McCann, Hansson, Raza, Herzig, Lied, Alho Letra Martins, Mellgren, Dierkes, Dankel. Relationship between Ketones, Ghrelin, and, Appetite on Isocaloric Diets with Varying Carbohydrate Quality and Amount: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in People with Obesity (CARBFUNC). Journal of Nutrition. 2023;153(2):459-469en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2137215
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.12.030
dc.identifier.issn0022-3166
dc.identifier.issn1541-6100
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/29630
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Nutrition
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleRelationship between Ketones, Ghrelin, and, Appetite on Isocaloric Diets with Varying Carbohydrate Quality and Amount: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in People with Obesity (CARBFUNC)en_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)