Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNørgaard, Jakob Nordberg
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Kari Lenita Falck
dc.contributor.authorSlørdahl, Tobias Schmidt
dc.contributor.authorVik, Anders
dc.contributor.authorTvedt, Tor Henrik Anderson
dc.contributor.authorSchjesvold, Fredrik
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-16T07:35:10Z
dc.date.available2024-04-16T07:35:10Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-09
dc.description.abstractInduction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care for young and fit patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) [1]. Induction therapy has evolved from doublet to triplet to quadruplet regimens over the last decades. The most common triplet therapy is either Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (VCD), Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (VRD), or less frequently Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD). No large, randomized phase III study comparing the VCD and VRD regimens has been conducted and is unlikely to be done in the future. Retrospective studies and smaller prospective studies comparing VRD and VCD have produced mixed results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNørgaard JN, Moore KLF, Slørdahl TS, Vik A, Tvedt THA, Schjesvold FH. VRD versus VCD as induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a nationwide population-based study. Blood Cancer Journal. 2024;14(60)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2261508
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01047-1
dc.identifier.issn2044-5385
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/33396
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.journalBlood Cancer Journal
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleVRD versus VCD as induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a nationwide population-based studyen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)