Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSterpu, Irene
dc.contributor.authorHerling, Lotta
dc.contributor.authorNordquist, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorRotgans, Jerome
dc.contributor.authorAcharya, Ganesh Prasad
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-16T11:22:39Z
dc.date.available2024-09-16T11:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-03
dc.description.abstractBackground Team-based learning (TBL) is an evidence-based pedagogical method that has been used in undergraduate medical education since 2001. However, its use in clinical disciplines is rarely reported, and the impact of its implementation is not known. The aim of this study was to explore and map the published literature on the impact of implementing TBL in clinical disciplines in undergraduate medical education.<p> <p>Methods A comprehensive search of Medline, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Web of Science databases was performed on November 24, 2021 and updated April 6, 2023, using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms. Original research studies reporting on the implementation of TBL in clinical disciplines in undergraduate medical education published in peer-reviewed English language journals were included irrespective of their methodological design. <p>Results The initial search identified 2,383 records. Of these, 49 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies (n=44, 90%) described the implementation of a modified version of TBL in which one or more TBL steps were missing, and one study had undefined protocol for the implementation. The most reported outcomes were knowledge acquisition (n=38, 78%) and students’ satisfaction or attitudes toward TBL (n=34, 69%). Despite some differences in their results, the studies found that implementing TBL is associated with increased knowledge acquisition (n=19, 39%), student engagement (n=6, 12%), and student satisfaction (n=31, 63%). <p>Conclusions Most of the studies reported positive results in students’ satisfaction and students’ engagement, whilst the results on knowledge acquisition and retention were more contradictory. In most of the studies, TBL was implemented in a modified form and diverse comparators were used. The methodological quality also varied. Thus, no unequivocal conclusions could be drawn regarding the value of implementing TBL in clinical disciplines. More studies with rigorous methodologies are needed in this field.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSterpu, Herling, Nordquist, Rotgans, Acharya. Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students—a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2228245
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12909-023-04975-x
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/34733
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Medical Education
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleTeam-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students—a scoping reviewen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)