Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBartell, Scott M.
dc.contributor.authorPurdue, Mark P.
dc.contributor.authorRhee, Jongeun
dc.contributor.authorNøst, Therese Haugdahl
dc.contributor.authorRusiecki, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSteenland, Kyle
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-13T13:30:34Z
dc.date.available2024-11-13T13:30:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-05
dc.description.abstractMany epidemiological studies use a single blood sample per participant to assess exposure, but it is unclear how well a single sample represents longer term exposure. We performed a simulation study using summary statistics for repeated serum PFOA measurements from several previous studies in men to generate plausible serum concentrations over time, taking within-subject correlations into account. Simulated serum concentrations for controls were categorized into quintiles at each time point, and used to determine the extent of misclassification at each time point compared to the “true” long-term average exposure. We then generated case counts by quintile needed to produce an odds ratio (OR) of 1.5 for the highest vs. lowest quintile categorized based on long term exposure, and used the same misclassification rates observed in the controls to simulate misclassified exposure quintiles for cases. Comparing long term vs. single baseline exposure measures for repeated serum samples collected within about 5–13 years of each other revealed similar effect estimates, although there was a small bias to the null. Trend tests across quintiles were mostly significant using either baseline or long-term exposure. For the general population sample of men in Norway, with 5 repeated measurements over 28 years, serum PFOA was substantially lower prior to 1987, and using either of the two earliest samples as the exposure metric, compared to the long term average, produced larger bias to the null and non-significant trend tests; however using later time points as the exposure metric resulted in only a small bias. Using data based on studies of men, single baseline serum samples represented rather well the mean of repeated samples collected up to 13 years apart, but were not always reliable surrogates for average exposure over 3 decades, during which time PFOA exposure levels in the general population have changed substantially.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBartell, Purdue, Rhee, Nøst, Rusiecki, Steenland. How well does a single blood sample represent long-term exposure for epidemiological studies of PFOA among men in the general population?. Environment International. 2024;192en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2313341
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2024.109056
dc.identifier.issn0160-4120
dc.identifier.issn1873-6750
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35705
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironment International
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en_US
dc.titleHow well does a single blood sample represent long-term exposure for epidemiological studies of PFOA among men in the general population?en_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)