Ab Initio Adult Third Language Acquisition: Transfer source selection and effects of CLI in acquisition of an artificial language
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/21884Date
2021-05-18Type
MastergradsoppgaveMaster thesis
Author
Stevens, Dashiel NaeaAbstract
The field of generative third language acquisition has seen considerable activity in the last decade, resulting in several dominant models which seek to explain the phenomenon of cross-linguistic influence (CLI) and transfer. This study investigates the role of previously acquired languages, Norwegian and English, in the acquisition of morphosyntax of a miniature artificial language (MAL) at the absolute initial (ab initio) stage of third language acquisition (L3A).
The study explores three factors in transfer source selection during third language acquisition: order of acquisition, structural vs. typological similarity, and the language of the acquisition environment. Results are drawn from a group of n = 77 Norwegian/English bilingual participants via two acceptability judgment tasks focused on sentence-level word order and verb seconding, completed following a training on the lexicon of the MAL. Separating the two assessments was an additional training segment where participants were exposed to two additional morphosyntactic structures found in their first language (L1), Norwegian, but not their second language (L2), English.
The results indicate support for the Linguistic Proximity Model (LPM; Westergaard et al., 2017; Westergaard, 2019, 2021a, 2021b) as the current model which most accurately explains the data, and suggests that CLI is the result of activation of linguistic structures with multiple sources of input (e.g. that CLI occurs property by property) and that language learners are receptive to a wide variety of cues which guide transfer source selection.
Publisher
UiT Norges arktiske universitetUiT The Arctic University of Norway
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Copyright 2021 The Author(s)
The following license file are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Limits on P: filling in holes vs. falling in holes
Svenonius, Peter (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2003)All Germanic languages make extensive use of verb-particle combinations (known as separable-prefix verbs in the OV languages). I show some basic differences here distinguishing the Scandinavian type from the OV West Germanic languages, with English superficially patterning with Scandinavian but actually manifesting a distinct type. Specifically, I argue that the P projection is split into p and P ... -
The role of aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages
Fábregas, Antonio; Marín, Rafael (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2012)Most of the literature devoted to the study of deverbal nominalizations concentrates on the complex event reading (La concentración de partículas tiene lugar a temperatura ambiente, ‘The concentration of particles takes place at room temperature’) and the object reading (El paciente tenía concentraciones de calcio en el hombro, ‘The patient had calcium concentrations in the shoulder’), while ... -
Directionality and Resultativity : The Cross-Linguistic Correlation Revisited
Son, Minjeong (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel, 2007)Recent approaches to the cross-linguistic variation in the expressions of directed motion assume a tight correlation between adjectival resultative and directed motion constructions (e.g., Beck and Snyder 2001, Mateu and Rigau 2001; 2002, McIntyre 2004, Beavers et al. 2004). Beck and Snyder (2001), in particular, argue that languages that allow adjectival resultatives also allow directed motion ...